Ad Limitations
Explicit disclosure of technical claims and operational boundaries.
01. What SATE Claims
SATE claims ONLY the following authoritative capabilities:
- •
It audits test suites for behavioral coherence.
- •
It proves whether tests assert consistent outcomes for the same behavioral surface.
- •
It detects contradictions between tests written at different times by different authors.
- •
It enforces the rule: “One Surface. One Truth.”
- •
It refuses to guess when truth cannot be determined.
- •
It produces deterministic, repeatable audit results.
- •
It materializes untestable, contradictory, or deferred behavior as auditable artifacts.
- •
It treats human-written tests and system-generated candidates with equal scrutiny.
02. What SATE Explicitly Does Not Claim
SATE does NOT claim to:
- ✖
Guarantee software correctness.
- ✖
Guarantee bug-free systems.
- ✖
Guarantee business logic validity.
- ✖
Generate exhaustive or complete test suites.
- ✖
Detect all edge cases.
- ✖
Automatically resolve contradictory tests.
- ✖
Decide which behavior is correct.
- ✖
Infer business intent, requirements, or domain meaning.
- ✖
Replace human judgment or ownership.
- ✖
Replace code review, QA processes, or architectural review.
03. Generation-Specific Limitations
- •
SATE-generated output is produced as candidates, not trusted tests.
- •
Generated candidates are always subordinate to the Auditor.
- •
Generated candidates may be rejected, deferred, or materialized as artifacts.
- •
SATE does NOT guarantee that generated candidates are correct.
- •
SATE does NOT guarantee that generated candidates represent intended behavior.
- •
SATE refuses to merge generated candidates that contradict existing behavioral truth.
- •
SATE will block generation rather than introduce inconsistent or ambiguous assertions.
Generation is proposal, not authority.
04. Serialization & Truth Boundaries
SATE serializes scalar behavioral truth only (booleans, numbers, strings, null).
SATE intentionally does NOT serialize:
- ✖
arrays
- ✖
objects
- ✖
Eloquent models
- ✖
nested data structures
- ✖
JSON or HTML response bodies beyond scalar signals
These are not technical gaps. These are intentional epistemic boundaries. Complex structures are intentionally excluded to preserve determinism.
05. Execution & Concurrency Limitations
SATE does NOT:
- ✖
Simulate concurrency.
- ✖
Simulate race conditions.
- ✖
Perform timing-based execution analysis.
- ✖
Perform load, stress, or chaos testing.
- ✖
Infer thread safety or locking correctness.
“SATE audits logical consistency, not runtime scheduling behavior.”
06. AI and Automation Boundaries
- •
SATE does NOT use probabilistic reasoning to assert truth.
- •
SATE does NOT use heuristic inference to guess outcomes.
- •
SATE does NOT learn business rules implicitly.
- •
SATE does NOT improve correctness through training.
- •
Any automation is strictly gated by audit rules.
- •
Refusal is preferred over speculation in all cases.
07. Enforcement & CI Responsibility
- •
SATE produces evidence, not policy.
- •
SATE does NOT decide CI pass/fail behavior.
- •
Teams decide how findings are enforced.
- •
Findings may exist even when CI is green.
- •
Contradictions are surfaced, not resolved.
SATE does not impose enforcement. Humans do.
08. Change Sensitivity Disclosure
SATE output is sensitive to code changes. Small code changes may change:
- – surface classification
- – artifact content
- – audit outcomes
This behavior is expected and intentional. Stability means determinism, not immutability.
09. Human Responsibility Statement
“SATE provides evidence, not decisions. Final responsibility for correctness, behavior, and acceptance remains with humans.”